Thursday, February 13, 2020

Assignment 9A-Testing the Hypothesis, Part 2

 Assignment 9A-Testing the Hypothesis, Part 2
  
  • WHO: Through my interviews, I discovered that certain groups of horse owners that I had assumed would fall inside my market, actually had no need or desire to use my proposed service I already had ruled out cattle ranchers, no one that raises these animals for meat is too concerned about how the odd dead cow gets dealt with. Not everyone is emotionally
  • My interviewees included horse owners who cannot afford the service but would use cremation if they could, people who view horses as livestock, not pets, and owners who care for horses while living but are not worried about the treatment of carcasses.
  • WHAT: Money seems to be a major factor that separates who is in my market and who is not.
  • Attitudes and background dictate what people consider to be the appropriate treatment of deceased animals
  • Being accustomed to a certain way of doing things, a willingness to accept current common practices.
  • WHY: Until regulations require adopting newer, more expensive disposal practices, many of my interviewees would not use my cremation services due to financial considerations and lack of dissatisfaction with current practices.
                                               
Inside the Boundary                                         Outside the Boundary
Who:
Horse owners that have emotional attachments to their animals and will pay more than they can afford

People who cannot afford the service
Horse owners that can easily afford service
People who view horses as livestock
Owners concerned about ethical/legal considerations
People comfortable with current practices
What:
The change in regulations in some areas
No need to comply with regulations, hard to enforce.
The shift in attitude about horses as livestock
People still have options acceptable to them
Why:
The ability to afford cremation services.  

People in this area tend to follow norms
that dictate certain behavior


3 comments:

  1. I really enjoy reading you blog posts week in and out because your idea is so unique compared to others. With this idea you have, I think it is a great one and it seems you narrowed down your market and realized that only certain people will use your service not just people who own horses. Money is a aspect of your market as people have to being willing and able to use your services. It was also interesting to see that people who treat horses as livestock fall outside your boundary but this makes sense because they probably do not have an emotional tie toward the horse.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This was very insightful because it recognizes that while many want to deal with deceased animals in a respectful way, many just want an inexpensive method of disposal. I think you could maybe capture this market by providing inexpensive methods of disposal as well. This is a very interesting concept and I am excited to see what happens if you choose to further pursue it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sarah, I am actually surprised not more people care about the disposal of their deceased horses. Typically, I feel as though people get very attached to their pets, and horses should definitely be considered pets. It would be a good idea to look into how to decrease the costs of cremation, considering there are definitely horse owners that would like to respectfully bury their beloved companions.

    ReplyDelete